author blames it on less reading because we can no longer concentrate for long periods on a specific task or read. Instead of thoughtfully mapping out my ideas and arguments, I jot down bullet points with my strings of thought and try to patch them together afterwards. He references to this scene because he believes our minds are Hals. He gradually works up to the idea that the internet has weakened his ability to focus, and as he does this he makes several general statements about the internets nature. From clocks to computers the use of electronics and tools is occurring every day in almost all situations. He also gives examples of how the clock and typewriter changed our way of thinking in the past. I think that the mental discipline we derive from deciphering and interpreting a text is incredibly important and we are beginning to lose that practice. Carrs theory may be more obvious as we continue to be reliant on technology. People dont have the attention span to commit to more complex and important ideas. He takes a more skeptical approach to the Internet and its increased use as a medium for reading. Instead of analyzing and connecting my different thoughts into cohesive arguments, I am left with fragmented pieces of an idea that I am not fully able to weave together.
Ironically, the internet provides us with a lot of useful information and he is quick to point it out. This ideology was still prevailing in the 17th century as expressed by Robert Burton in his writing titled The Anatomy of Melancholy stating that books contained huge volumes of chaos and confusion that made the eyes and fingers ache. In his own words: Once I was a scuba diver in a sea of words, and Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski. Ambiguity is not an opening for insight but a bug to be fixed. I really dont like this because it implies that our very essence is formulaic and reproducible. Policies arent deeply rooted and developed in an effective equity valuation dissertation way.